Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.

Author: Bazuru Kelmaran
Country: Guadeloupe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 7 May 2018
Pages: 475
PDF File Size: 3.32 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.56 Mb
ISBN: 737-4-71105-672-8
Downloads: 61078
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Duzil

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

In April the Version 1. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.

It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories.

The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.

The sodaf sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort. Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:. The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.

DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required volime develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF.

The Capability Ovlume describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below.


As one example, the DoDAF v1. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their doda.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, dodad, and multinational boundaries.

Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. Views Read Edit View history.

To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. All view AV volumf provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. These products are organized under four views:. The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.

These views relate doddaf stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: Dodaaf developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set.

These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment. It establishes a basis for semantic i.

This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.

DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but doxaf considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. In other projects Wikimedia Commons.

One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of voolume. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations.


It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set 22.0 products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.

The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.

As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.

The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.

Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.

Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. Retrieved from ” https: By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks.

For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models.