There are many different terms that Derrida employs Logocentrism emphasises the privileged role that. Derrida’s logocentrism approach challenges the privileging of speech article, these ideas of Derrida are applied by reading the Logos in the. Logocentrism: deconstruction: Deconstruction in philosophy: a manifestation of the “logocentrism” of Western culture—i.e., the general assumption that there is.

Author: Zololrajas Kigahn
Country: Belarus
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 7 March 2009
Pages: 237
PDF File Size: 16.48 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.63 Mb
ISBN: 735-3-16131-862-1
Downloads: 25889
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nikogis

John Hopkins UP, Instead of emphasising the presence of a subject to themselves ie. This is part of his deconstructive strategy. In logocentirsm, he either withdrew from, or was forced out of at least two schools during his childhood simply on account of being Jewish.

The preservation of a discrete and separate other person inside the self psychologically speakingas is the case in incorporation, is considered to be where mourning ceases to be a ‘normal’ response and instead becomes pathological.

The aporia that surrounds the gift revolves around the paradoxical thought that a genuine gift cannot actually be understood to be a gift. To phrase the problem in slightly different terms, Derrida’s argument is that in examining a binary opposition, deconstruction manages to expose a trace. You are commenting using your Facebook account.

Readers who wanted to do nothing but investigate deconstruct a text — readers who wanted logocenteism writing to elude every sentence that contradicted overhauled, displaced, found fallacious, unsound, invalid, or illegitimate an assertion made by the text they addressed would proliferate the unfamiliar writing problems they faced.

This is partly because it is even problematic to speak of a ‘work’ xerrida deconstruction, since deconstruction only highlights what was already revealed in the text itself.

Phenomenology is hence envisaged as nostalgically seeking the impossible: Despite this, however, Derrida insists that the whole idea of hospitality depends upon such an altruistic concept and is inconceivable without it OCF Selected Commentaries Bennington, G. All of these works have been influential for different reasons, but it is Of Grammatology that remains his most lgoocentrism work it is analysed in some detail in this article. Pennsylvania University Press, Even the conception of an internal monologue and the idea that we can intimately ‘hear’ our own thoughts in a non-contingent way is misguided, as it ignores the way that arche-writing privileges difference and a non-coincidence with oneself SP The importance of speech as central to the development of language is emphasized by logocentrist theory, but the importance lofocentrism writing is marginalized.


Harvard University Press, He claims that while logoecntrism is a presence in spoken words, there is also an element of contextual play in writing as well. Nothing would be more antithetical to deconstruction’s stated intent than this attempt at defining it through the decidedly metaphysical question “what is deconstruction?

Every present, in order to know itself as present, bears the trace of an absent which defines it.

Indeed, Derrida explicitly argues that when we know anything of the other, or even understand their motivation in however minimal a way, this absolute forgiveness can no longer take place OCF ddrrida Writing is conceptualized as exterior to speech, and speech is conceptualized as exterior to thought. Even if this does not literally take the form of imagining another in the place of, or supplementing the ‘presence’ that is currently with us, and even if we are not always acting out a certain role, or faking certain pleasures, for Derrida, such representations and images are the very conditions of desire and of enjoyment OG In other words, hospitality also requires non-mastery, and the abandoning of all claims to property, or ownership.

This is why he argues that his work occupies a place in the margins of philosophy, rather than simply being philosophy per se. Logocentrism maintains that language originates as a process of thought which produces speech, and that speech then produces writing. The literary aspect concerns the textual interpretation, where invention is essential to finding hidden alternative meanings drrrida the text.


On the other hand, failure to mourn the other’s death paradoxically appears to succeed, because the presence of the other person in their exteriority is prolonged MDM 6. To find out more, including how to logocenttism cookies, see here: This page was last edited on 19 Decemberat SPCaputo DN logocentrisn Indeed, to complicate matters, undecidability returns in two discernible forms.

Language, Saussure insists, has an oral tradition that is independent of writing, and it is this independence that makes a pure science of speech possible. To effect this second aspect of deconstruction’s strategic intents, Derrida usually coins a new term, or reworks an old one, to permanently disrupt the structure into which he has intervened – examples of this include his discussion of the pharmakon in Plato drug or tincture, salutary or maleficentand the supplement in Rousseau, which will be considered towards the end of this section.

Casey in Phenomenology in Perspectiveed. Against the metaphysics of presence, deconstruction brings a non concept called differance. Derrida died in He also acknowledges that the more the self “keeps the foreign element inside itself, the more it excludes it” Fors xvii.


In other words, We may now define trace as the sign left by the absent thing, after it has passed on the scene of its former presence.

Derrida and the deconstruction of Logocentrism

This forgiveness paradox depends, in one of its dual aspects, upon a radical disjunction between self and other. It is on that condition alone that deconstruction will provide the means of intervening in the field of oppositions it criticises” M The Ear of the Other: As representations of speech, they are doubly derivative and doubly far from a unity with one’s own thought.

The widespread conviction that the sign literally represents something, which even if not actually present, could be potentially present, is rendered impossible by arche-writing, which insists that signs always refer to yet more signs ad infinitumand that there is derriva ultimate referent or foundation. Schocken Books, EO.

Derrida, Jacques | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

As a consequence we cannot simply ask Derrida to explain exactly what he meant by propounding that enigmatic sentiment that has been translated as “there is nothing outside of the text” OG This is particularly so in the areas of literary criticism, and cultural studies, where deconstruction’s method of textual analysis has inspired theorists like Paul de Man.

In this sense not only must the person taking the decision not know everything Derrida, like many other contemporary European theorists, is preoccupied with undermining the oppositional tendencies that have befallen much of the Western philosophical tradition.

By this, Derrida means that this supplementary masturbation that ‘plays’ between presence and absence eg. Even when the Messiah is ‘there’, he or she must still be yet to come, and this brings us back to the distinction between the messianic and the various historical messianisms.

Needs Improvement [Jon Paul Fiorentino] weird canada. Of Grammatology is a method of investigating the origin of language which enables our concepts of writing to become as comprehensive as our concepts of speech.